Yes, thank you for the note. We didn't immediately pay attention to the fact that we're talking about textual mentions. It's just that the link for delisted services is disabled by default.
If we're talking about the link, it previously belonged to a legitimate service, which is evident even from the administrator's responses to reviews mentioning the domain. This fact didn't raise any concerns for anyone.
It's likely that access was lost after the cooperation ended. We will pass the information to the moderation team, and they will edit or remove all suspicious links. However, it's worth noting that not a single text link is active on our service, so there is no direct redirect from this page to a phishing site.
If we're talking about the link, it previously belonged to a legitimate service, which is evident even from the administrator's responses to reviews mentioning the domain. This fact didn't raise any concerns for anyone.
It's likely that access was lost after the cooperation ended. We will pass the information to the moderation team, and they will edit or remove all suspicious links. However, it's worth noting that not a single text link is active on our service, so there is no direct redirect from this page to a phishing site.
Although you don't have a direct link, the behaviour of the average site visitor can always be unpredictable. Here is an example, maybe this is your user, for example:
If this domain is not yours : exch dot CC - [SCAM link]
Then im just lost my funds right now
Rest in peace 0.0027 btc
Then im just lost my funds right now
Rest in peace 0.0027 btcIf you are a reliable service that strives to provide accurate and useful information, you should have no doubts or any reason to withhold information that leads to a phishing site.
Quote
It is also quite ironic to see complaints about these links from people openly promoting this exchange on the forum.
I believe that what is in someone's signature is completely irrelevant, but the message that is written.