Quote from: Ruttoshi on March 24, 2025, 10:09:16 AM

Quote from: EarnOnVictor on March 24, 2025, 09:08:30 AM

Quote from: Ruttoshi on March 23, 2025, 04:22:20 PM

Quote from: EarnOnVictor on March 23, 2025, 11:55:33 AM

Quote from: Altryist on March 22, 2025, 04:01:24 PM

Quote from: JeffBrad12 on March 22, 2025, 02:07:55 PM

Amorim has been United's worst coach in the history. Even Moyes has recorded better stats than him in only 5 games, while he did it on 14 games. As you can see how bad Amorim's quality is. That's why i think Manchester United has not yet comeback. Everytime they win against a small team, people called they're so back. What a fucking joke is it? Cheesy

As per Manchester United's owner, Sir Jim, he doesn't wanna sack Amoruim, but let him stay much longer. He has hinted Amorim's future on his interview.

As for Tottenham, it seems fucking Levy is reluctant to pay the compensation once he sacks Ange. That's why he keeps him much longer. Cheesy

Amorim should have understood where he was going, Manchester United was in a bad state even before he was appointed head coach, and after that he sold several more attacking players and what did he expect, that just because he became a coach, the team should win, no, that's not how it works. Apparently, Amorim is not as good a coach as expected, and most likely they will give him more time, Manchester United management has such an approach, they gave time to every coach they had, but as history has shown, it did not help any of them.

Have you seen a coach of Man U that has not been ridiculed and thrown several blames in recent years? That's why I am not surprised about yours, it's the beginning for Amorim and perhaps he will not be the one leading the club by this time next year, it has always been like that for Man U. This doesn't spare the players too, it's just like a curse, when they were bought, they would be very outstanding, after all, that's why they were bought, but on getting to Old Trafford, the issue starts. On leaving again, they rediscover themselves, the case of Anthony is a good one. Man U is what it is.

Manchester United is not the only club that players do go and wouldn't be able to perform well. It happens in other clubs too. I don't see why you guys are not seeing it that the players United are buying cannot fit in to their game style and EPL. Some players can perform well in a smaller club than when they're in a big club.

Only if United can buy the right players that will make football easy for them and interesting to watch.

@Altryist and I are entitled to our opinions just as you are, but what I won't take is the misrepresentation of facts and an argumentative way which will still lead to nothing (saying so much but nothing). I don't doubt that some specific players can go to a club and not perform, but I dare you to mention the clubs whose case is as much as that of Man U. Don't mention junks here, you should mention those clubs where hot stars bought becomes almost useless but after leaving the club they regain back their feats like Anthony that I mentioned. And please mention them in their numbers.

You are taking discussions too personal and I don't see anything wrong from what I said. Lukaku is a Chelsea player that doesn't fit into Chelsea playing pattern, and that has made most past coaches put him on loan in the Italian League despite the challenges that Chelsea was facing in previous seasons.
Look at the brilliant performance of Lukaku in Seria A and he has also achieved a lot in Seria A. I have many more players that I can mention but O will rest my case here. Apart from Anthony, can you tell me another Manchester United player that did the same. Pls don't call Sancho because he is been criticized by Chelsea currently.

What's personal here? This is a communication and I wonder why some of you take it otherwise when you don't have your way easily, and certainly with me on this, you can NEVER have it.

I purposely didn't exclude Lukaku of the then-Chelsea in my last post because I knew you might mention it, and here we are, and you mentioned only him even though it happened a long time ago, we are talking about the recent, within a year. Lukaku has been loaned to clubs before sold and he did well in all of them. This even made me know you are clueless because Lukaku was never a dullard (true speculators knew) but a player who needed time then and he showed the talent where he "was and is" better appreciated. Can you compare this with Man U where almost all their players are now something else? I am sure those guys in Man U will still shine when left. We are talking about general happening in a club, you are talking about the peculiarity of Lukaku, how are they the same?