Quote from: Rating Place on March 24, 2025, 04:39:14 PM

Quote from: BlackyJacky on March 24, 2025, 12:18:12 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on March 24, 2025, 07:23:58 AM

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters.

How do you know that she isn't getting paid by online casinos?

Quote from: Rating Place on March 24, 2025, 07:23:58 AM

I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place.

Psychologically abusing online casino victims is heart at the right place?

Quote from: Rating Place on March 24, 2025, 07:23:58 AM

If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

If you get paid to attack online casino victims, maybe it is not a huge waste of time?

I'm not 100% sure if he's getting paid or not. It's my guess based on how he posts.

Someone who psychologically abuses online casino victims isn't a selfless justice fighter who does it for free!

Quote from: Rating Place on March 24, 2025, 07:23:58 AM

I've seen him talk positively and negatively about the same casino. Holydarkness has to walk a fine line. No casino is going to talk to him if he's not respectful.

Have you also seen her (unjustifiably) talking negatively about online casino victims?

Quote from: holydarkness on February 28, 2025, 07:03:34 PM

Hmm... must be fun to live in the world inside your head where you're always right and when someone pointed out that you're not, either ignore the fact [because you're always right, so you shouldn't address the matter where they show that you're not] like when you try to point out my "fun fact" that stake routinely scan this board, which I then show the full statement made by the rep herself, which prove that the "fun fact" is actually a, well, "fact", or, when an ADR refuse to mediate due to the lack of evidence, they're stupid.

Comparing CG to police is misleading... is it, though? Try to go to the police and accuse someone without concrete evidence, see if they'll take your case seriously. By "your concrete evidence", I believe we all [but you] understand that what you served them --if we compare to what you tried to serve to CG on your thread there, as well as here in those wall of text and numbers-- are not valid as a compelling prima facie because well, your understanding of how the system works is wrong, but then again, in the world you're living inside your head, you're the one who always right. Even three AI and other people are wrong.

"Fun fact": this phrase kept repeating in my head while I write this post, "off with his head!", I guess I know why, LOL.