Quote from: Sim_card on Today at 04:49:55 PM

It's better to invest aggressively if you can in the beginning with DCA in a fast pace than invest in a whimpy way when you can buy aggressively.

Even though many of us suggest that a person should attempt to invest as aggressively ast they are able to without recking themselves, each person has to figure out and choose his level of aggressiveness in terms of his conviction towards bitcoin. It surely is better to invest whimpily rather than not investing at all, yet the extent to which someone chooses to be whimpy or aggressive in their bitcoin investment might come back to a variety of factors related to their own personal comforts with bitcoin as compared with other possible places to put their investment and also their abilities to defer gratifications.. since some folks have difficulties cutting back on their spending.

Surely if bitcoin ends up continuing to perform well, there will be folks who invested whimpily who will regret to to their having had not invested into bitcoin more aggressively, so if we spend 10 years or more investing into bitcoin, we can not turn back the clock and wished that we would have had been prioritizing our bitcoin investment more than we had done in the earlier times of our investment into it.

So surely a guy who had been investing $100 per week into bitcoin would end up having 10x more bitcoin than the guy investing $10 per week into bitcoin, yet there can still be questions regarding how he chose to use the other $90 per week that he was not investing into bitcoin. It is difficult to attempt to set priorities for someone else, even though we may well know that each of us is responsible for our actions including knowing that there are likely varying consequences for whatever actions we choose to take or not to take.... and sometimes we may well not even realize that we had been too aggressive or too whimpy in our bitcoin accumulation approach until some later point down the road... perhaps many years later.