spi......
I think they have considered it too so they do not hesitate to implement this rule, so we do not have to worry about it. Apart from that, even though the casino requires KYC we can still see many users coming and I do not even see users decreasing significantly because of this rule. Actually if we look at the journey, then I think it will be the same in the future, meaning even though at the beginning the casino did not require KYC, then in the future we do not know what changes they will make.
It doesn't really matter if they implement this rule as long as they can maintain the trust of users. And don't forget they also build trust not only in a short time, so I don't think they will destroy what they have built for years, yes even though the risk is still there.
I have seen many players playing games in casinos without KYC, but when this KYC system came, they never disagreed because they knew the positive aspects. With the KYC system, there is no possibility of losing their money, and the casino player can exchange it. I have not seen any element where the number of casino players has decreased due to the arrival of the KYC system. I have seen many scams where many people lost their money without KYC, but after the arrival of this KYC system, the game players have done a good job. There is no fear of losing whatever they have. From what I can see in the current scenario, there will be no game shortly without the KYC system.