Quote from: nutildah on Today at 03:54:34 AM

Quote from: FortuneJack on March 26, 2025, 07:39:43 PM

The case is still under review by the competent court. Out of three claims, the court dismissed two claims made by the Claimant and stated that Fortunejack's terms and conditions were validly applied.

You should just pay the remaining, incorrectly voided bet now.

We all saw the court documents and how Bet #3 wasn't considered a duplicate bet by the highest authority there is in this largely unregulated space. You shouldn't have to wait to see if there is some final technicality you can slip in to avoid having to pay OP what is due to them; especially when the right thing to do is more obvious in this case compared to most others.

Unless I understand the summary wrongly, that is actually what is to be determined by 24th March; the amount due from the wrongly voided bet [bet number 3].

I gave the summary a thorough read last night after glanced at it and made my post above, and another read today during my morning coffee. Basically, this is what OP demanded; to get his winnings unvoided and refunded with interest and the legal fee:

and this is the court's "findings", as we all well understand; that only bet number 3 should not be voided, and that the amount payable to the player is yet to be determined at later date:

Namely, three days ago:

So, OP, can you please provide us with the summary for the latest hearing?