Quote from: Cointxz on Today at 02:38:12 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 01:49:28 PM

I don’t want to prolong discussion here because it will be off topic already. I just mentioned that even a complete decentralized casino can still confiscate players bet if they involved on shady bets.

I t was proven that the person in question was guilty of match fixing.

Bitcoin-Betting runs 4 nodes. They may be the only one that is truly decentralized. Being able to connect with Metamask doesn’t guarantee that a casino is decentralized. As Fairlay, authorities could force money to be withheld. That’s no longer the case with Bitcoin-Betting since funds are in smart contracts.

My comment is not personal and I’m not the type of person that consistently degrading a casino due to my personal satisfaction. My opinion is merely just an example that even a decentralized casino sometimes has a problem since the OP is looking for casino without KYC.

Quote

Regardless, I’ll use Stake since it’s in your signature, there are 6 scam accusations on the first page of scam accusations against Stake. You are picking out one problem in 13 years for Bitcoin-Betting.

All casino has an existing scam accusation but most of them defend themselves if the evidence is strong against the casino. I myself will support players if the evidence that he submitted is substantial.

[/quote]That was Fairlay with the fixed match and they were centralized. They have become decentralized with the switch to Bitcoin-Betting.