Quote from: Beparanf on March 28, 2025, 06:23:29 PM

Quote from: l3pox on March 27, 2025, 06:43:07 PM

I agree, being the owner is better, has more upside and pays more, the thing is that it's way more stressful too and usually not the best way if you want to have time and be relaxed
I don't know
each option has it's pros and cons, it's up to each one to define their risk profile too

Owner usually doesn’t do all the work especially on big casino brand because they usually just hire employees to run the website while they just monitoring everything from the reports given by the employee.

It’s very rare for the owner to do the heavy job especially if the casino is already making money. I think only new casino that has low fundings usually have the owner as developer and still do the work for his casino to save expenses.

Most of the casino nowadays is backed by private companies that just fund the casino operations.

yes, but they have all the risk and have to do the strategic work
even though they don't deal with all the operations, it can be stressful too
you need a lot of money to fund a casino nowadays
even if the owner is not the developed there are so many more things besides the code side of it too, costumer relationship, marketing, security...