Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Airdropped legendary vs self-made legendary...
by
lovesmayfamilis
on 03/04/2025, 08:36:19 UTC
This is exactly what I wanted to say. There are many talented people on the forum, but there are also those who, due to the number of alternatives, write nonsense or repeat the same thing from topic to topic, simply rearranging the words. I will not list all those from whom I see an exchange of merits; it looks very template. People rate posts that others find not only empty, but also difficult to read. From here we see high ranks, publishing nonsense, but despite this, are evaluated by the same as they are.

For example:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=663136
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=667920
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=662950
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=815243

I think it's pretty hard not to notice the unique posting style, which is very similar to those who rate the same posts.

Yes, it is. Do you think / assume / have evidence that there is also payment-based merit sending? Like users paying others for earning merits.
I don't understand why these users exchange merits though. If I could (for instance) buy 10,000 merits and be a shitposter, would anyone look at me as a serious user? Would I be able to be a campaign member? I am sure not.

You haven't looked at their posts. This is one person who writes something like "really" day and night, everywhere where it is necessary and not necessary.
I try to read the posts of many users, but this style, oddly enough, is unique and similar for these few accounts. Merits are not sold; they are transferred to their accounts, which, as it turns out, is not punishable, especially without strong evidence.
One word, "really," tears my eyes Shocked out and causes an allergy; it appears so often in their posts because it is very difficult to read.

In addition, you see that all of them, one way or another, participate in signature companies. Grin