Not all the active users on the list are marked as using AI. I would like to clarify, if they were caught once, what should they expect in case of repeated, regular use of AI? Some do not have a tag at all, and some have a neutral one. Will neutral tags turn into a negative tag? Many of the users always ask to be warned before leaving a tag. Are neutral tags a warning?
I would ask that reports be accepted only after checking three or more tools, as we see frequent false positives. People end up on the AI spammer list, sometimes purely by accident.
I suggest starting a search for new detectors that could replace them, such as sapling.ai, as it is practically useless, and its results are posted only formally for the sake of quantity.
Perhaps I wasn't very specific. Active means that they're still active on the forum, having a latest post history within the past 30 days. That doesn't necessarily mean that they're still using AI, but they are users who have been reported at least once and the report was accurate. It doesn't mean that they're still using AI
, I want to clear this misunderstanding. This is the reason why I've added links to their profiles, so anyone can easily click on the user and see for themselves if they're still suspicious or not.
With a glance, some profiles still show signs of AI usage, but I haven't gone through to check, it's just that some posts stand out without requiring me to go through a detector.
Also, I personally not going to report someone who's giving me mixed results. I'll first check, do their posts look suspicious? If yes, proceed to the next step, start scanning them. If I can't produce satisfactory results (for instance 4 out of 5 detectors showing that they're AI written) they go to my watch list so I can check again in the future. In the meantime, I'll check older posts to see if there's a difference in their writing style and pattern.