Yes, thank you. I understood you correctly, and you wrote everything correctly. I wanted to know if there will be repeated uses of AI; what can these users with an existing tag expect?
Perhaps that's for the mods to decide, I'm not sure if I'm the right person to answer that. Maybe @Igetbotz can shed some light to this topic. From my perspective, those who are not using AI anymore may be subject to change their reputation status, still a neutral tag but mentioning that they used to use AI? Any thoughts about this? In my opinion, repeated users, especially newer ranks, up to Member could result in a temporary or permanent banned, depending on the user or the case.
I'd like to hear more opinions about this matter, and perhaps I'll start checking a few of the active users myself.
Those sound like quite discretionary matters, including how the forum might treat the use of AI matter, since there are some members who have more egregious incidents than others, and they might even have other areas that they are breaking forum rules that justify more extreme sanctions against them.
With tags, if there were one or two incidents, but then the member might have had come clean or at least not had further incidents, then some members might choose to remove the tag, yet surely some members leave tags for extended periods of time too and might prefer to keep something like a neutral tag in order to serve as a reminder. Part of my own personal reason for not tagging members very frequently is that I feel that I would need to create another system for keeping track, which surely takes time to accomplish, but then the removal of tags might have some other reasoning besides what is written in the tag.. and surely we likely see that some members might have very shitty writing styles that don't seem to improve very much with the passage of time, and other members might improve in their substantive contributions to the forum and then justify the removal of the tag in the eyes of the person who put the tag in the first place..