Well that is the funny thing, no one believes in true sequential. None of the pools, not even Bram lol.
If solve time is average of 50% regardless of the order of ranges, why don't the pools nor anyone, start at key x and search it all to key z? Does human nature/gut feelings get involved? Or some kind of personal, average probability based on past wallets solved? Would love to hear their reasoning.
If you go full sequential from 0 to N you’re giving away your progress to the competition. It has nothing to do with better probabilities of finding the key.
For the record the only reason I talk here is to prevent folks from spending money thinking they have a 0.0001% chance of success while it’s in fact more like 0.00000000…..0001%
I’m likely taking 68 but that does not mean I enjoy people throwing their money out the window. Especially when fooled by baseless math theories.
mutagen work perfectly, he is mach faster then bitcrack etc. For solve 68 need max 3 months with 200 mkeys/sec.