If one can (has) track what they've searched, or even know what they've done during any jumps/skips based on h160 partial matches, or anything else, it is just as fast at solving than what anyone else is using, meaning same average solve time...50%. Debate your mama lol!
An statistical prefix search could significantly optimize the mining process. If you apply statistical analysis, it's possible to prioritize certain data ranges or sequences that have a higher probability of success, translating into greater efficiency. That's why I ignore those who think they know it all and don't let them influence my ideas.
The expected value Is always 50% regardless of how you scan. The birthday paradox has no relevance here, it's simply bruteforcing
Lol
Literally dismissing both the winner of 67 and the guy who made public a 40% speed improvement on the tool you guys use as script kiddies.
Kudos, you're doing great so far.
Well that is the funny thing, no one believes in true sequential. None of the pools, not even Bram lol.
If solve time is average of 50% regardless of the order of ranges, why don't the pools nor anyone, start at key x and search it all to key z? Does human nature/gut feelings get involved? Or some kind of personal, average probability based on past wallets solved? Would love to hear their reasoning.
If you go full sequential from 0 to N you’re giving away your progress to the competition. It has nothing to do with better probabilities of finding the key.
Sequential A:Z is slower than Random+ Sequential, for the simple reason that you introduce the birthday paradox, which gives you a percentage greater than 50%. I don’t understand why you say you’re giving away your progress to the competition if you go from 0 to N. Is your pool public?.
If you go from A-Z and people know it, why would they also go A-Z and overlap with your work.
They have a greater incentive to go Z-A, all the work you do (public or not) is literally gifted to them.