Quote from: Bram24732 on Today at 06:09:17 AM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on Today at 04:24:40 AM

Well that is the funny thing, no one believes in true sequential. None of the pools, not even Bram lol.

If solve time is average of 50% regardless of the order of ranges, why don't the pools nor anyone, start at key x and search it all to key z? Does human nature/gut feelings get involved? Or some kind of personal, average probability based on past wallets solved? Would love to hear their reasoning.

If you go full sequential from 0 to N you’re giving away your progress to the competition. It has nothing to do with better probabilities of finding the key.

For the record the only reason I talk here is to prevent folks from spending money thinking they have a 0.0001% chance of success while it’s in fact more like 0.00000000…..0001%
I’m likely taking 68 but that does not mean I enjoy people throwing their money out the window. Especially when fooled by baseless math theories.

Where can one watch your progress for 68? Do you have a link?

Some times it takes people losing money or their time, to finally understand, there are no shortcuts. So if you tell them once, and they don't listen, why beat a dead horse?

Quote

I admit that the first time someone told me about the prefix theory, I said: wow! Cool! But then I thought about it for five minutes and realized it didn’t make sense.

What was their theory, regarding prefixes/partial h160 matches?