Furthermore i was told i could test the games myself over a large number of games and verify it myself - partial quote: "For now, the RTP is based on our internal testing. You can also verify it yourself by placing a large number of bets — for example, around a million bets with the minimum amount of 0.00000001. Over such a long run, you'll see that the RTP is accurate." Needless to say, how dare they even suggest such a thing, i already felt like i was being robbed, so how is this in any way an appropriate suggestion to make?
umm... i think it's a reasonable suggestion to make.
since you are claiming that "The rtp of the in-house games are, for all intents and purposes, completely fictional." it shouldn't be so hard for you to calculate the house edge for each game without even needing to do a million bets, which in return will show you if the expected RTP is accurate or not.
and after all, the burden of evidence lies with the one making the accusation.
so where is your proof that the RTP is fake?
The gaming software can be modified after a test, therefore a test is senseless!
But everyone can check if a game is rigged:
If your experienced house edge is higher than the advertised house edge plus maximal possible deviation, determined by the law of large numbers, than the gaming software is rigged!
oh look, it's the dumbass who doesn't even understand basic math or how the house edge works is saying big words to sound smart.