Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 07/04/2025, 02:11:19 UTC
Quote from: Ararbermas on April 06, 2025, 04:42:43 AM
Many projects are now undergoing rebranding, even those that initially seemed focused solely on raising funds from investors. Like for example those projects that ended up becoming irrelevant in the market after listing. Honestly, this method of recovery is quite confusing, and it's likely to raise questions, especially among those who have taken a break from the space. Why choose to rebrand instead of reviving the original project if it was simply forgotten? To be honest, it doesn't seem very promising to me.
maybe the original concept of the project wasn't a success in the first place and rebranding give them a way to rethink about the project and give it fresh start.
honestly rebranding is way better than the the other option which is the developer just outright abandoning the project because the old holder will be at loss if that's the case, meanwhile rebranding can help the old holder to migrate their token to the new tech and potentially make profit in the future.
nothing wrong with brandingrebranding as far a I know. as long as it doesn't just magically inflate the total supply and dilute the circulating supply which therefore reduce the worth of the coin.
Original archived Re: Can a long forgotten project do well after getting rebranded?
Scraped on 07/04/2025, 02:06:06 UTC
Quote from: Ararbermas on April 06, 2025, 04:42:43 AM
Many projects are now undergoing rebranding, even those that initially seemed focused solely on raising funds from investors. Like for example those projects that ended up becoming irrelevant in the market after listing. Honestly, this method of recovery is quite confusing, and it's likely to raise questions, especially among those who have taken a break from the space. Why choose to rebrand instead of reviving the original project if it was simply forgotten? To be honest, it doesn't seem very promising to me.
maybe the original concept of the project wasn't a success in the first place and rebranding give them a way to rethink about the project and give it fresh start.
honestly rebranding is way better than the the other option which is the developer just outright abandoning the project because the old holder will be at loss if that's the case, meanwhile rebranding can help the old holder to migrate their token to the new tech and potentially make profit in the future.
nothing wrong with branding as far a I know. as long as it doesn't just magically inflate the total supply and dilute the circulating supply which therefore reduce the worth of the coin.