14/04/2025, 13:16:18 UTC POST DELETED
Edited on 07/04/2025, 13:46:17 UTC
gotta love and laugh at how you say the formula is idiotic and has things the wrong way round..
how about just take the formulae for what it is, take the findings for what they are and realise it explains the RECIPROCAL
why waste time saying the formulae is idiotic and is wrong and blah to try to say it doesnt explain the china 67
realise it was never trying to explain china 67.
YOUrealise why you are also being a fool trying to flip things aroundcalling the formulae wrong and say thatidiotic and dumb is because you are not understanding it so you think the US sends more goods TO china(facepalm)formulae is the wrong thing
no its not the wrong thing.. YOU are trying to apply it to the wrong thing
you are trying to apply it to the country tariff. when you are avoiding applying it to the reason of the reciprocal discount
even the USTR uses the word reciprocal.. even this topic i created here is about reciprocal
YOU are the one talking about how it must apply to the china67
so please if you only want to try to make sense of how china 67 came about.. make a topic about china 67
Scraped on 07/04/2025, 13:21:34 UTC
gotta love and laugh at how you say the formula is idiotingidiotic and has things the wrong way round..
how about just take the formulae for what it is, take the findings for what they are and realise it explains the RECIPROCAL
why waste time saying the formulae is idiotic and is wrong and blah to try to say it doesnt explain the china 67
realise it was never trying to explain china 67.
YOU are thealso being a fool trying to flip things around and say that the US sends more goods TO china(facepalm)
Original archived Re: trumps "reciprocal" is pegged rate 2:1(mostly)
Scraped on 07/04/2025, 13:16:16 UTC
gotta love and laugh at how you say the formula is idioting and has things the wrong way round..
how about just take the formulae for what it is, take the findings for what they are and realise it explains the RECIPROCAL
why waste time saying the formulae is idiotic and is wrong and blah to try to say it doesnt explain the china 67
realise it was never trying to explain china 67.
YOU are the fool trying to flip things around and say that the US sends more goods TO china