I apologize in advance, I don’t want to offend anyone.
Everyone has their own approach to searching for private keys in this game. I, for example, don’t use a GPU. I based my work on keyhunt with heavy modifications, and now I’ve reached 400 Pkeys/s on an old CPU, even though initially I couldn’t get above 60 Pkeys/s.
Everyone has their own approach to searching for private keys in this game. I, for example, don’t use a GPU. I based my work on keyhunt with heavy modifications, and now I’ve reached 400 Pkeys/s on an old CPU, even though initially I couldn’t get above 60 Pkeys/s.
Rumor has it, if you flash a custom firmware to a doorbell, it can do 7 exa keys/s.
I think most people are unaware that skipping 7 exakeys/s, or even many many multiples of that, in a space of exponential size equals jack shit.
Let me guess: you think BSGS is even remotely feasible for anything above 80 or so bits, right?
There's nothing (and there can be nothing) faster when it comes to real keys/s then purely adding some public keys together without any side-step requirements (such, as, uh-oh, making some table lookups at every freaking step). Guess what's the name of that algorithm?
I don’t owe anyone any proof.
I’ll say it straight — right now, I’m searching for 135.
https://ibb.co/whQdZcpC
) why not search for 69, 71, chances are much much much... better