Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 04:01:32 AM

Quote from: Stepstowealth on January 02, 2025, 11:26:27 PM

As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?

In my case I think I would prefer to be a casino owner. In both cases you have the math in your favor, but you are only going to make a profit if you get enough people to come to your casino, or play your game. I think I would rather control everything from one casino than having to sell my game in many different casinos. But it all comes down to your profit.

Of course everyone will surely like to be a casino owner without hesitation because casino owner makes more money than game owners.

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 04:01:32 AM

If in that hypothetical situation I would make more profit being a game owner than being a casino owner I would prefer the former.

No matter the hypothetical, and your point of view I still doubt that game owner will be more profitable than casino owners. You need to know that Casino owners have the right to accept or decline any offer given to them by game owners. What if it happens that the turndown offers of the game owner is much in different casinos then obviously he is not going to make any fucking money? The reason is that most Casino owners are going into programing or coding of games and with this ideas they creat new games and include it on their features and upgrade while the game owners are like people looking for work everywhere with no or less choice. So preferably casino owners are more advantageous over game owners.