Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 12/04/2025, 21:19:07 UTC
It might be useful bump this thread to ask for input in the discussion currently taking place on telegram:

Quote
watashicombdev:
Smallest Know Post Quantum Signature Schemes (Sig + Pk = SigPk):

1. SQIsign 204 bytes + 64 bytes = 268 bytes // note: slow signing (~2.5s)
2. Haircomb 10 320 bytes + 32 bytes = 352 bytes // note: one time scheme, extremely slow signing, but faster than WOTS+
3. WOTS+ 320 bytes + 32 byte = 352 bytes // note: one time scheme, uses 10 chains (l=8+2), computationally impractical chains.
4. EMLE-I 280 bytes + 416 byte = 696 bytes // note: uses embedded multilayer equations
5. Haircomb 672 bytes + 32 bytes = 704 bytes // note: one time scheme, used by haircomb currency
6. Falcon-512 690 bytes + 897 bytes = 1587 bytes
7. MAYO ~300 bytes + ~400 bytes = ~700 bytes

any opinions or ideas? or are we just going watch the dev push the boulder up the hill alone. there must be some oldtimers left who are interested in PQSS ideas.
Original archived Re: [ANN][COMB] Haircomb - Quantum proof, anonymity and more
Scraped on 12/04/2025, 21:13:52 UTC
It might be useful bump this thread to ask for input in the discussion currently on telegram:

Quote
watashicombdev:
Smallest Know Post Quantum Signature Schemes (Sig + Pk = SigPk):

1. SQIsign 204 bytes + 64 bytes = 268 bytes // note: slow signing (~2.5s)
2. Haircomb 10 320 bytes + 32 bytes = 352 bytes // note: one time scheme, extremely slow signing, but faster than WOTS+
3. WOTS+ 320 bytes + 32 byte = 352 bytes // note: one time scheme, uses 10 chains (l=8+2), computationally impractical chains.
4. EMLE-I 280 bytes + 416 byte = 696 bytes // note: uses embedded multilayer equations
5. Haircomb 672 bytes + 32 bytes = 704 bytes // note: one time scheme, used by haircomb currency
6. Falcon-512 690 bytes + 897 bytes = 1587 bytes
7. MAYO ~300 bytes + ~400 bytes = ~700 bytes

any opinions or ideas? or are we just going watch the dev push the boulder up the hill alone