Quote from: Ultegra134 on April 04, 2025, 06:28:38 PM

slapper Legendary (May require further investigation)

I decided to follow up on slapper, and not only are they still using AI, but it has since been discovered that they are part of an account farm. One of their accounts is Blitzboy, who was tagged for ban evasion and who was previously reported in this thread as an AI spammer. death69 is another alt and after looking at the ETH address on their profile, I found a connection to kabul, who is another spammer, although no longer active.

I have already mentioned how slapper humanizes their posts by inserting subtle mistakes. In this post, you can see how the periods are removed at the end of paragraphs.

Quote from: slapper on Today at 01:24:04 AM

What you're describing isn't just hypothetical; it's actually taking place right now. Experts call this the final phase of demand failure, but it's not just consumer demand but also human participation. Antidepressants, survival gigs, and numb compliance support a facade of productivity when people opt out emotionally and mentally. Asking whether a monetary airdrop should be done is absurd. We should be wondering why it hasn't happened already. You bail out banks, industries, even private equity portfolios. Why not the folks maintaining the system? We need to stop seeing inflation fear and human rescue as two separate issues. If you think injecting $10k into broken lives risks inflation, wait till you see what social decay costs

Technically, it's doable. The U.S. did it partially with stimulus checks. Effectively, unevenly, but it turned out that money moves quickly. Stablecoins can make the plumbing easier. You may target it algorithmically, distribute it through digital wallets with spending limits for high-impact use cases: health, debt, shelter

Still, the money comes but it is not the end. It should be matched with dignity. Otherwise, people treat the help like crumbs from the table. Airdrops should carry a story: "We see you. You are important. You belong to this". Stabilizing the economy through emotional repair is more reliable. Rebuilding GDP on broken minds is impossible. But you can build a new world order by acknowledging that survival is no longer about ambition. Then asking them to return into the game as citizens once more rather than consumers

In this case, their attempt to evade detection weren’t entirely effective.
Originality: 100% Likely AI
GPTZero: 79% AI Generated, 1% Mixed, 20% Human

Here is a post from death69. For a while, I could not figure out how they were evading detection, because most of the time the results say their posts are human-written despite looking very obviously AI-generated. After reading the text in the following post really carefully, I noticed how they inserted words like “enchantment” and “face injection assaults” which make no sense, but it seems to be one of their tactics for trying to avoid being detected as AI.

Quote from: death69 on April 12, 2025, 03:24:31 PM

With KYC verification, casinos are engaging in a dangerous game. Although AI-driven systems can detect fraud and identity theft, in practice these systems are only as good as the data they are supplied. Without proper entry points, AI cannot enchantment determine authenticity. The idea that casinos can fight AI-powered fraud with more AI? It is a never-ending circle, a defense mechanism that never truly wins. We have liveness detection, face injection assaults, and all kinds of fresh approaches emerging quicker than security can handle.

Casinos, like any other institution, are motivated by money. Sure, they can apply all these high-tech solutions, but it's starting to seem like this KYC verification game might only be a show, a formality to acquire that valuable licence. Although they would say they are combating fraud, how can they ensure anything without actual access to national ID data? Their struggle is practically a performance, a mirage of protection based on unstable foundation. And whose gains result from this? The scammers, the abusers, the ones manipulating the system.

GPTZero: 100% AI - We are highly confident this text has been rewritten by AI, an AI paraphraser or AI bypasser.
Copyleaks: 100% AI content found

Quote from: death69 on April 10, 2025, 01:44:46 AM

Yes, I can feel the annoyance. That ghost of the win is basically blue-balling you, the universe, or the house. You begin to fantasize about upgrading as you spend the spoils in your mind. That's not like losing your stake entirely. The score is known and the possibility of a tie or a loss is accepted when placing a bet.

The "almost-win", though? That represents a higher order headfuck. The destruction of the almost-reality you lived for a second marks more than just the loss of the money. The hope felt more like a confirmed signal, momentarily true than it did just hope. Then, poof. Your predictive mind is about to take a swift and decisive hit. A clean loss lets you start over. This almost-miss leaves a residue, a poisonous "what if" that taints your judgment. You're not just sad about losing the money; you're also dealing with a fake glimpse of a different life, a psychological trick meant to make the loss feel personal and targeted. It's more about your intentional weaponizing of your own expectations than about the result of the gamble.

Winston AI: 2% Human
Originality: 84% Likely AI