Quote from: bibilgin on April 16, 2025, 09:34:33 PM

Let's go back to the beginning;
I told you in the first messages, you look down on people. You are being disrespectful. If you have knowledge, share it or have a logical conversation.

Logical conversation:

You: "No one said they broke 3 math structures. Oh, btw, look, I can find John without knocking 10k doors..."
Me: "You are contradicting yourself."
You: "Drug head lol"

Unless someone is on weed, IDK how can they ever engage intn such a high-level argumentative logic.

Quote from: kTimesG on April 16, 2025, 05:40:17 PM

I wonder why none of the prefix believers fails to answer this simple question:

Assuming the prefix theory works, it automatically implies a weakness in the cryptographic guarantees of Bitcoin, and more generally automatically implies that the elliptic curve cryptographic assumptions are broken, and also the cryptographic security of SHA256 and/or RIPEMD-160 are also broken.

Yielding BTC as a 0$ asset. Hence, why would you try to solve the puzzle?

If so, why the hell aren't you guys publish a paper and wait for the academic gratitude? It would worth infinitely more than some stupid satoshis... RIGHT ?!?

Maybe because you know deep inside that you're simply just chasing ghosts of the statistical fluctuations of something that is not distinguishable from randomness? Or are you afraid that you'll need to call all the academic peers who'd dismiss your paper in 5 seconds, as people who obviously "don't understand probabilities" and have zero clues about math?

Up.