Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 17/04/2025, 21:01:51 UTC
Now based on this, do you feel a casino is more likely to be careless with people's data than they will with money to hackers because most hacks seem to target money they have more?
What I know is that a casino will not be careless with both but any between them can be hacked at anytime. Hackers targetstarget money but they also target data. But I am surprised that data is not targettargeted unlike how it was before. I think the hackers are no more targeting data like before because the centralized platform will announcedplatforms are announcing it without giving the hackers no money as ransom.


I think. The data they hold and risk losing is more important to gamblers than the money the money they have,
Is it? Do you think casinos will retain customers if they have lost their hot wallet or even the entire bankroll but kept all the user data, including KYC documents safe?
This is true. Just like I included up there that there were times that I noticed some exchanges are hacked bybut the exchangeexchanges did not pay for ransom but warned their customers to be careful that their data has been hacked. That means the hackers lose which could even be the reason I noticed hackers prefer to only target money this timemost now.

There has been many data breaches but the centralized platforms did not fold up but there have been many centralized platforms that folded up immediately they were hacked as money was stolen from them.
Original archived Re: People's data or+ money, which is more important for safekeep by a casino?
Scraped on 17/04/2025, 20:56:29 UTC
Now based on this, do you feel a casino is more likely to be careless with people's data than they will with money to hackers because most hacks seem to target money they have more?
What I know is that a casino will not be careless with both but any between them can be hacked at anytime. Hackers targets money but they also target data. But I am surprised that data is not target unlike how it was before. I think the hackers are no more targeting data because the centralized platform will announced it without giving the hackers no money as ransom.


I think. The data they hold and risk losing is more important to gamblers than the money the money they have,
Is it? Do you think casinos will retain customers if they have lost their hot wallet or even the entire bankroll but kept all the user data, including KYC documents safe?
This is true. Just like I included up there that there were times that I noticed some exchanges are hacked by the exchange did not pay for ransom but warned customers to be careful that their data has been hacked. That means the hackers lose which could even be the reason I noticed hackers prefer to only target money this time.