Did you ever been in the court?
In the countries with roman laws, the one that accuse other to do something have to prove it.
So, assuming, that doing valuebetting is prohibited, what is totally false, is the casino the one that have to prove it.
It doesn't matter if i say that i do valuebetting or not, the casino does not know what i do in other casinos. They have to prove that i did valuebetting IN THEIR CASINO.
If they don't show those proofs, we have to assume that they don't have those proofs, so the question is: why do they block the account and took the funds?
The answer is simply: Because they are THIEVES.
Have you?
So far, we've got the
mens rea, the confession, and two "witnesses" put you at "the crime scene" [the place/situation you're in, namely being flagged by Betby]. That'll limit your option to provide an alternative plausible explanation of the situation to free yourself from the self-incrimination. The prosecutor will just say "the prosecution rests", and they sit idly, like what they're doing right now, and sans the defendant's counterargument, the court will quite likely ruled that the defendant found to be guilty.
So, have you?