No, it's not. It's only 56 bits.

Closest one he has is


which is 58 bits.

If that doesn't make sense to you because the base58 prefix is longer... what can I say, longer base58 prefixes don't mean a better actual prefix match, due to how the numerical ranges overlap more or less with the binary ranges, since the bits are the fundamental unit of counting quantity of information, not monkey emojis / b58 digits.

No, it's not. It's only 56 bits.

Closest one he has is


which is 58 bits.

If that doesn't make sense to you because the base58 prefix is longer... what can I say, longer base58 prefixes don't mean a better actual prefix match, due to how the numerical ranges overlap more or less with the binary ranges, since the bits are the tundamentalfundamental unit of counting quantity of information, not monkey emojis / b58 digits.

No, it's not. It's only 56 bits.

Closest one he has is


which is 58 bits.

If that doesn't make sense to you because the base58 prefix is longer... what can I say, longer base58 prefixes don't mean a better actual prefix match, due to how the numerical ranges overlap more or less with the binary ranges, since the bits are the tundamental unit of counting quantity of information, not monkey emojis / b58 digits.