Quote from: Lucius on Today at 10:54:14 AM

Quote from: pushups44 on April 19, 2025, 02:35:19 PM

You literally responded to the opening post with a 530 character reply, asserting that no meaningful discussion can arise from it. So why reply? I for one would not write 530 character posts about a topic I feel is not worth my time.

What I wanted to say is that you did nothing more than copy text from a website without giving any of your own opinion. Such topics were usually deleted or moved, but apparently standards have changed.

I added some snippets to start a conversation, and I subsequently gave my views in the thread. Meanwhile, you keep on responding and kicking this thread up to the top of the list of threads, all the while claiming nothing useful can come of this. I have said, and others have said, that this topic is of interest, and that Adam Back's opinions are more interesting than yours.

Do you have any views on the national security risks of QCs? If so, post them. All you blathered is that Satoshi should have burned his coins, but you failed to provide any meaningful discussion to the threat of QCs to the network.

Quote

You're wrong, it's not 50 cents, it's $3. In addition, you think that AB does not charge for everything it says? I hear he got paid a nice amount for that documentary that was popular a few months ago, and in the end it didn't reveal anything new about Satoshi. I understand that some people deeply appreciate what people like AB have to say, even when they're not saying anything important.

You're still not adding anything substantial to this discussion. Do you have anything to add about the threat of QCs to the network? By the way, as you respond, you are clearly showing the topic is worthwhile in some sense - by kicking it up to the top. Yet you fail to contribute in any meaningful way. Others have contributed.