Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 20/04/2025, 10:12:09 UTC
There's nothing wrong with attempting to break cryptography, as long as you admit this is what you're trying to do.
Breaking it outright is practically impossible with current technology. However, optimizations—through better hardware, algorithms, or exploiting implementation flaws—can sometimes speed up certain tasks. These improvements don't 'break' cryptography, but they can make some things much faster. There is no simple explanation for a 5th-grade schoolboy.
Yep, and so my answer to that will be : GitHub or it didn’t happen.
A lousy theory on a forum post is not enough to be taken seriously. Especially when easily disproven with basic math.
It’s not like there isn’t a simple way to prove it.
Create 100 44 bits puzzles.
Run them with a sequential search
Run them with your magic method
Average times
If one is significantly faster than the other congratulations, you found an edge. If not, go back to work.
Original archived Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Scraped on 20/04/2025, 10:07:06 UTC
There's nothing wrong with attempting to break cryptography, as long as you admit this is what you're trying to do.
Breaking it outright is practically impossible with current technology. However, optimizations—through better hardware, algorithms, or exploiting implementation flaws—can sometimes speed up certain tasks. These improvements don't 'break' cryptography, but they can make some things much faster. There is no simple explanation for a 5th-grade schoolboy.
Yep, and so my answer to that will be : GitHub or it didn’t happen.
A lousy theory on a forum post is not enough to be taken seriously. Especially when easily disproven with basic math