For me trading na advance gambling wether we like am or not because you no go know until you put your hand involved. The most annoying thing na when all those traders dey claim say dem be expert and dem get super channels wey if you join them you go get better signals and before you know people go still join them and then lose my money well well for me I just believe say trading na gambling and if you join am na loses you go get at the end.
No mate trading is not an advance gambling
, however and why do you think is an advanced gambling by the way?, was there any place you will
stake a bet on thewager in trading?,
i no that we normally say they have similarities and that's true because of the risk but we cannot leave that to presume it as advance, meanwhile we don't have to trade to no any relationship about them and besides a lot of persons that trades
are not even in support or agreement to thiscould have acknowledged it if it was true, though I no say na because of those plenty money way you say you done loss na in they make you think say na advance one, so actually you should have just
say issaid the
namelosing experiences is why you are
givingcomparing it
based on your losing experiences instead creating another meaning to
itadvance gambling, however In gambling players are the ones providing results but in traditing a whole lot of things are the reason for any results.