Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 23/04/2025, 19:38:36 UTC
Are you ready for now ATH?
Grok approved $127,131 by late April?
Grok approved $127,131 by late April?
if ( Bitcoin > 90000){
println("maybe");
}
AI fanbois: OMG buy buy buy
If Grok was actually intelligent, it would answer the question the right way:
Quote from: notGrok
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
AI is not efficient enough, sometimes overcomplicating things, or is it just me?
I don't know man. That sounds kind of racist. Is racist the right word? Maybe lifeist or perhaps sentientist? Artificial intelligence deserves to have an opinion as much as any of us. Maybe more since it doesn't care if you listen and won't get offended if some emotional response is meant to insult it. I say bring on the AI predictions and let us find out what is worthy of our attention.
I'm sorry, but you're wrong. It's just Machine Based Learning at the current level.
I guess the highest ethical question in this case is: Can you hurt a rock's feelings?
EDIT: Missed that part on AI predictions.
So, right, i've got no problem with any opinion whatsoever when it comes to bitcoin. But i wouldn't value the AI opinion higher than most of the other ones.
Original archived Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Scraped on 23/04/2025, 19:08:19 UTC
Are you ready for now ATH?
Grok approved $127,131 by late April?
Grok approved $127,131 by late April?
if ( Bitcoin > 90000){
println("maybe");
}
AI fanbois: OMG buy buy buy
If Grok was actually intelligent, it would answer the question the right way:
Quote from: notGrok
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
AI is not efficient enough, sometimes overcomplicating things, or is it just me?
I don't know man. That sounds kind of racist. Is racist the right word? Maybe lifeist or perhaps sentientist? Artificial intelligence deserves to have an opinion as much as any of us. Maybe more since it doesn't care if you listen and won't get offended if some emotional response is meant to insult it. I say bring on the AI predictions and let us find out what is worthy of our attention.
I'm sorry, but you're wrong. It's just Machine Based Learning at the current level.
I guess the highest ethical question in this case is: Can you hurt a rock's feelings?