I don't really have nothing to add besides the fact that you are right.

After all, no one cares that you can't read a histogram, otherwise you'd understand that your gibberish non-sense is... just nonsense.

Or that you failed to even understand what I was talking about.

Or a LOT of other things that you can only answer with some tic-tac-toe image or a "lol" or with some totally trolling non-sense.

Or that the Scooby Doo method works better than your prefix method!

Or that using some coordination between the methods you compare introduces bias.

If I have a method that works better than your method (let's say, simply traverse the range backwards), why do you forbid it as a valid method? Are you actually rational maybe 1%? This is about testing concepts 101 after all.

Do you understand, in plain English? A method that basically does NOTHING except stopping the block, no matter where it's at, with a chance of 1 in 5000, works BETTER than your exceptional breakthrough, and yes, it always works.

My cat would understand. You don't. But somehow, we're the idiots here.

And before you ask yourself: be sure that, whenever you bring up your prefix method, I will demonstrate to everyone that the Scooby Doo method works better. Just so you know.

Why? Because being stupid for yourself doesn't mean you need to spread that around.