Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 24/04/2025, 00:03:45 UTC
Do they matter or not? Are they the same or what?
You contradict yourself at a speed of three lines per post.
I agree with that.
You contradict yourself at a speed of three lines per post.
Quote
Now, here's the conclusion: you are right.
I agree with that.
I don't really have nothing to add besides the fact that you are right.
By your logic, precise always wins, not just in 56% of cases. Fuck the rest of 40% where it loses in a very dramatic way. Those 40% definitely do not exist. Prefix always wins, and that's it, anyone who says something else is a liar and an idiot.
After all, no one cares that you can't read a histogram, otherwise you'd understand that your gibberish non-sense is... just nonsense.
Or that you failed to even understand what I was talking about.
Or a LOT of other things that you can only answer with some tic-tac-toe image or a "lol" or with some totally trolling non-sense.
Or that the Scooby Doo method works better than your prefix method!
Or that using some coordination between the methods you compare introduces bias.
If I have a method that works better than your method (let's say, simply traverse the range backwards), why do you forbid it as a valid method? Are you actually rational maybe 1%? This is about testing concepts 101 after all.
Do you understand, in plain English? A method that basically does NOTHING except stopping the block, no matter where it's at, with a chance of 1 in 5000, works BETTER than your exceptional breakthrough, and yes, it always works.
My cat would understand. You don't. But somehow, we're the idiots here.
And before you ask yourself: be sure that, whenever you bring up your prefix method, I will demonstrate to everyone that the Scooby Doo method works better. Just so you know.
Why? Because being stupid for yourself doesn't mean you need to spread that around.
Original archived Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Scraped on 23/04/2025, 23:33:25 UTC
Do they matter or not? Are they the same or what?
You contradict yourself at a speed of three lines per post.
I agree with that.
You contradict yourself at a speed of three lines per post.
Quote
Now, here's the conclusion: you are right.
I agree with that.
I don't really have nothing to add besides the fact that you are right.
After all, no one cares that you can't read a histogram, otherwise you'd understand that your gibberish non-sense is... just nonsense.
Or that you failed to even understand what I was talking about.
Or a LOT of other things that you can only answer with some tic-tac-toe image or a "lol" or with some totally trolling non-sense.
Or that the Scooby Doo method works better than your prefix method!
Or that using some coordination between the methods you compare introduces bias.
If I have a method that works better than your method (let's say, simply traverse the range backwards), why do you forbid it as a valid method? Are you actually rational maybe 1%? This is about testing concepts 101 after all.
Do you understand, in plain English? A method that basically does NOTHING except stopping the block, no matter where it's at, with a chance of 1 in 5000, works BETTER than your exceptional breakthrough, and yes, it always works.
My cat would understand. You don't. But somehow, we're the idiots here.
And before you ask yourself: be sure that, whenever you bring up your prefix method, I will demonstrate to everyone that the Scooby Doo method works better. Just so you know.
Why? Because being stupid for yourself doesn't mean you need to spread that around.