Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 24/04/2025, 13:49:51 UTC
Is it so difficult for you to post an entire code?
YES - because the immediate response would be "how do I know you didn't rigged my code".
You already have the code.
It is your code. You just have to change one line. Everything else is untouched.
I guess this is the difficult part now?
OMG - oh wow, we have the AI analysis. Nice! Did you also ask it why the method works better than your original version? Or is the actual empirical proofs being better than your own, a PROBLEM now? I mean... LOL indeed.
Fuck this, it doesn't make sense to engage with you any longer. I give up. It's totally useless. But I will still push my Scooby Doo ahead every time I see
Everyone: Here is an apple.
You: No, that's a potato.
Everyone: Here's a potato.
You: No, that's an orange.
You're better off in my ignore list forever though. Actually, I should pity you because apparently this puzzle thing drove you to lose your sanity completely, and you're unfortunately not a singular case...
Lol.
𝐸=𝑚𝑐2 to 𝐸=𝑚𝑐3
Einstein was wrong.
The verification using the hash prefix relies on robust cryptographic and probabilistic principles. Changing it to a check based on a random event (such as selecting 1 out of every 5000 cases regardless of the actual hash value) breaks the expected logical relationship and, consequently, the efficiency and consistency of the algorithm. This is equivalent to altering a fundamental constant in the formula, leading to unpredictable results and the loss of the theoretical foundation on which the method was based.
.
Original archived Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Scraped on 24/04/2025, 13:44:52 UTC
Is it so difficult for you to post an entire code?
YES - because the immediate response would be "how do I know you didn't rigged my code".
You already have the code.
It is your code. You just have to change one line. Everything else is untouched.
I guess this is the difficult part now?
OMG - oh wow, we have the AI analysis. Nice! Did you also ask it why the method works better than your original version? Or is the actual empirical proofs being better than your own, a PROBLEM now? I mean... LOL indeed.
Fuck this, it doesn't make sense to engage with you any longer. I give up. It's totally useless. But I will still push my Scooby Doo ahead every time I see
Everyone: Here is an apple.
You: No, that's a potato.
Everyone: Here's a potato.
You: No, that's an orange.
You're better off in my ignore list forever though. Actually, I should pity you because apparently this puzzle thing drove you to lose your sanity completely, and you're unfortunately not a singular case...
Lol.
𝐸=𝑚𝑐2 to 𝐸=𝑚𝑐3
Einstein was wrong.
.