Hey monrad,

Thanks for speaking up.

The 40% dev fund was something I genuinely thought was fair—mainly to make sure the project can keep going long-term without running out of steam, especially since Atto didn’t have and won’t have an ICO. But I get how it might seem high, and I’m open to adjusting it if there’s a better approach.

Would something like 20% make more sense to you? I’m not set on any number—I just want to make sure we can keep building without relying on outside funding or losing momentum.

If you have examples from older projects that handled this well—or even ones that didn’t—I’d really appreciate it. Any help figuring out a fair and sustainable allocation would be super helpful.

Would you be up for a more detailed conversation on GitHub so we can keep track of the reasoning behind the decision? I'll create the PR with the 20% change and ping you if you are open for that.

EDIT: Just created a discussion. Would you feel like joining?

Hey monrad,

Thanks for speaking up.

The 40% dev fund was something I genuinely thought was fair—mainly to make sure the project can keep going long-term without running out of steam, especially since Atto didn’t have and won’t have an ICO. But I get how it might seem high, and I’m open to adjusting it if there’s a better approach.

Would something like 20% make more sense to you? I’m not set on any number—I just want to make sure we can keep building without relying on outside funding or losing momentum.

If you have examples from older projects that handled this well—or even ones that didn’t—I’d really appreciate it. Any help figuring out a fair and sustainable allocation would be super helpful.

Would you be up for a more detailed conversation on GitHub so we can keep track of the reasoning behind the decision? I'll create the PR with the 20% change and ping you if you are open for that.