This is how legendary accounts show an example to all other newbies that they don't know the rules

. What does the banning rule sound like?
I confess, to my shame, I didn’t know this rule.
I agree, my knowledge of the rules is certainly not an example for others.
I have already voiced this (in previous posts) that Legendry should not be a subject of "deification" as a source of absolute truth. Legendary is rather an indicator of systematicity and persistence (in order to accumulate activity and merit), first of all.
25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]
At least, you shouldn't say it out loud. However, I do not doubt that patience for several years for those who had several accounts is simply impossible.
Then it turns out that the account that created this topic @GreatOrchid_alt should also be banned
(I mean,
doesn't this case fall under this rule), right? His previous account is banned, but he posts from an alternative account.
In light of all that has been said (rule 25), my post above somewhat loses its relevance (rather, it even looks harmful).
It turns out that having made a mistake once (having broken a rule), the user forever loses access to the forum (as a source of information, but not as a reader). This makes a little sad, because this user could be useful to the
BTC-community (although I doubt that there were many such users out of all those banned), but there is no way back for him. If these are the rules, what can do?