I'm certain that the only exact comparison method is for both to follow the same path... but he simply avoids doing so to deceive—a "fool hunter".
Your certainty is a plain-out total non-sense. The Scooby Doo method does not give a shit on how other methods work. This was the main point to be proven, and it succeeded 100% - for anyone who isn't blind.
Your method, on the other hand, is 100% dependent on how the other method works. Which, again, for anyone who isn't a total retard, is the main reason why it wins more - because this is how it's built to, by design.
No, my method does not depend on knowing which other method is being used; it simply demonstrates that, regardless of the method you choose, it is always better when probabilistic prefix searching is included.
Everyone: The Scooby Doo methods work just as better as the prefix method does. Just check out the results for yourselves. Do not listen to trolls, use your brains.
All the methods you've tried to use against me, I have improved using prefixes. I think you're blind then...
Now I will ignore you. Not on my list, it's simply not necessary. I will act as if you don't exist. Every time I think more that you are some kind of Digaran. You are not pro-science. Just an egotistical narcissist.