A detailed explanation without giving any concrete evidence or allowing me to respond lol. I am interested in getting a lawyer for this. Do you know any lawyers in Curacao who have worked on similar cases in the past?

Your second statement is exactly what's wrong with these third party arbitrators: "On top of "MAC, IMEI, tracking cookies, websites can also (and mostly) track devices from their fingerprint, and I don't want to believe a platform of such size, sensitive to multi-account abuses is not using such tools." You are choosing to believe Stake over me simply because they are bigger and more powerful. There is a big problem with doing this because Stake can then arbitrarily close accounts and seize funds with no repercussion since people will always choose to believe a big corporation over an individual. For my case in particular, if they were actually basing the device off of fingerprints, then I am 100% confident my device has only accessed this one Stake account. I want Stake to provide all the evidence they have against me and list all the alts they believe are mine, but of course I am now not even able to respond since CG just shut down my case completely.