Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 07:39:23 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on April 27, 2025, 10:53:49 PM

the mods know what they are doing.

The fact that the user was banned and later unbanned means at least one Mod didn't know what he was doing Tongue

Well Human error. Nobody is above that. The flaws in his story wasn't even noticed by other members until it was pointed out by Brahmahatyaa

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on April 27, 2025, 09:34:34 AM

Quote from: Brahmahatyaa on April 21, 2025, 09:33:56 PM

If @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange did accidentally copy and paste, then why are some of the words he wrote different from the original post?

Quote from: Dr.Bitcoin_Strange on April 18, 2025, 11:48:11 AM

In the terms and policies of some centralized exchange, they state that they don't accept Bitcoins from an untrusted source such as mixers or a wallet that has been flagged, some exchange even state that they don't accept Bitcoins from casinos.

So, if any customer disobeys those rules and send Bitcoin from the mixer on any sources that the exchange doesn't want, they will block the persons account and the customer could lose their coins.
The exchange are doing so to protect their self too from government policies, I guess.
So, when they cease those coins, how sure are we that they will take it to the government?

Sometimes, after making such deposit, before the exchange detects it, you must have traded the Bitcoin to Fiat and withdraw it to your account, so what will the exchange do after you have already withdrawn the money to your account before they later found out that the coins was tainted?

Quote from: Mrbluntzy on April 18, 2025, 11:37:22 AM

In the terms and policies of some centralized exchange, they stated that they don't accept Bitcoins from an untrusted source such as mixers or a wallet that has been flagged, some exchange even stated that they don't accept Bitcoins from casinos.

So, if any customer disobeys those rules and send Bitcoin from the mixer or any sources that the exchange doesn't want, they will block the persons account and the customer could lose their coins forever.
The exchange are doing so to protect their image too based on the government policies, I guess.
So, when they cease those coins, how sure are we that they will take it to the government?

Sometimes, after making such deposit, before the exchange detects it, you must have traded the Bitcoin to Fiat and withdraw it to your account, so what will the exchange do after you have already withdrawn the money to your account before they later found out that the coins was tainted?

Another thing that just popped in my head now is, what if after you deposited the Bitcoin because you needed some money and wanted to convert the Bitcoin to Fiat, but you later changed your mind and you decided to withdraw back the money to a newly created address, will the casino report that your address to be flagged?

If @Dr.Bitcoin did not intentionally copy paste the post, the writing should be the same. But in this case @Dr.Bitcoin seems to have done it on purpose.

It looks like the ban was a good decision, because it looks like a copy paste with word spinners.

I don't think it was plagiarism but will support JollyGood on this that's it might be an alt account.

Why?

What Dr strange posted was the post made that wasn't worked on before been posted by Mrbluntzy.

When he was making the post with Mrbluntzy, the one posted by strange was made first but after reviewing felt that it was lacking in quality and corrected where lapses maybe coming from.
Then when he logged in with strange he posted the unrevised version without knowing.

There are times I have made a response then preview and felt like the grammar was poor
And had to edit. Maybe that's what happened here.

P.S I have no evidence nor experience here so could be wrong
But I guess the Pro's on this can check out my theory.

If I'm not mistaken, having an alt account doesn't warrant been banned, so likely not a case of plagiarism.

Again Could be wrong.