Quote from: DaNNy001 on April 28, 2025, 03:24:45 PM

Quote from: Botnake on April 28, 2025, 11:08:19 AM

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on April 28, 2025, 10:52:27 AM

I would never trust AI with my money, whether gambling, daytrading, transactions or simply holding it. One bug or hallucination and all the money could disappear in a second. Maybe I am being too paranoid but I choose humans over programs everytime when it comes to decisions that have a financial impact.

Same here, but have you ever thought about experimenting with that? I mean, some say AI can make us successful in gambling, so haven’t you been curious if what they’re saying is true or not? Or are you already convinced that AI will never deliver a win for us?

Well if it's for curiosity, I think every gambler would be curious to know especially when people are saying that AI is giving them results and like for my own case I think it was just mere luck because after a couple of great results everything went sideways and back to normal as it being very hard to make a win but although I won't lie I actually taught for some moment there if AI actually cracked the code to winning cause it was something worth trying though.

Quote from: Churchillvv on April 28, 2025, 10:21:10 PM

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on April 28, 2025, 10:52:27 AM

Quote from: Churchillvv on April 27, 2025, 05:56:05 PM

....

I would never trust AI with my money, whether gambling, daytrading, transactions or simply holding it. One bug or hallucination and all the money could disappear in a second. Maybe I am being too paranoid but I choose humans over programs everytime when it comes to decisions that have a financial impact.

Of course, AI models are not best to rely on when it comes to financial services or cases but perhaps put of curiosity I had to test out what it's like to use AI when it's a highly probable situation, however it came out in favour of AI.

Curiosity is a great thing. But it has its limits, especially when you think about it logically.

Gambling is pure probability, so unless you can assume (as well as measure) a deterministic universe, and manage the feat of raising your own odds of winning by a negligible amount (which is still a good result from a relativistic point of view), it will still not cancel out the built-in house edge (meaning in the long run you still will lose in terms of probabilities). The end result remains that you leave the thrill and the fun of gambling to a machine, which will lose in the long term anyway.