I have so much respect for hierarchy and that is the reason for my curiosity, ever since I started participating in signature campaign, I have seen campaigns where participants of different rank are being paid the same amount and in most instances the hero/legendary, there are reasons for the pecking order in the forum which includes activities and merits, in my expectations it could have been more officially rigid in respect and or subject to this generally in terms of always making the differences according to hierarchy. To satisfy my curiosity I really want to know why some campaigns don't give this due diligence and others does and what is the reason behind it?
I seems that the reason why different manager have different policy in campaigns rules is because they need participants that can deem it fit to make a traffic or to reach the demands or deliver the own of signature campaigns brand managed, managers paying different hierarchy different amounts it's base on the amount given to them and also a tax given to them by the owner of the casino or exchange they're promoting.
For me separating the payment ration of H/L members is good, because its cheating from H members, they don't earn same merit, the merit margin is too far, but the thing is the wear same signature space, for me payment of Legendary members is supposed to be higher than the one of Hero members.