Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: [Duelbits.com]- $71,338.44 Stolen via Predatory Practices & Deceptive Operations
by
kingbj21
on 29/04/2025, 17:37:23 UTC
With al due respect KingBJ21, your situation seems more like a result of your own decisions. You deposited the money voluntarily and nobody forced you to gamble. They haven't stolen or deceived u, it is just lack of self control.

Blaming the platform for not helping with your gambling addiction doesn't hold much weight. Its your own responsiblity to seek help and not the casino's job to babysit you. KYC and responsible gambling are not magic switches to stop you from destroying yourself in the casino.

As for the staff overlaps it just sounds like speculation. People working for multiple casinos under different aliases isn't uncommon in this industry. So it doe'sn't automaticlly imply a scam.

You lost money gambling. Now it didn't go your way, calling for boycotts and refunds feels like shifting the blame. What if u had won money?

Did Duelbits also rig their provably fair Blackjack?

Thank you for your perspective, noviesol. I understand your point about personal responsibility in gambling, and I agree that players must be accountable for their decisions. However, licensed casinos like Duelbits have a legal obligation to protect vulnerable players, which they failed to do in my case. Despite clear signs of problem gambling—erratic betting, high deposits, and minimal withdrawals—they ignored their duty to enforce KYC, source-of-funds checks, or responsible gambling interventions. This isn’t about expecting them to "babysit"; it’s about holding them accountable for violating Curacao regulations.

Regarding staff overlap, it’s not speculation. Evidence shows “Albert” from Duelbits is the same person as “Alexander” on Stake.com. The issue isn’t just working for multiple casinos—it’s the lack of transparency and different aliases, which raises concerns about potential collusion.

The refund claim isn’t about shifting blame; it’s about Duelbits’ failure to meet their legal obligations. Curacao court precedent supports refunds for self-excluded players, which they ignored. And to clarify, there’s no accusation of rigged games—the complaint is about their regulatory negligence and deceptive practices.

This isn’t just a gambler’s bad luck; it’s a platform profiting from exploitation. Accountability matters, and Duelbits must answer for their actions.