Thank you for your perspective, noviesol. I understand your point aboutagree that personal responsibility is key in gambling, and I agree that players must be accountable for their decisionsdon’t dispute my role in depositing funds voluntarily. However, as a licensed casinos likecasino under Curacao regulations, Duelbits havehas a legal obligationduty to protect vulnerable players, which—a duty they failed to do inuphold. In my case. Despite, they ignored clear signs of problem gambling—red flags: erratic betting patterns, high deposits, and minimal withdrawals—they ignored their duty to enforce totaling $71,338.44 in losses. No KYC, no source-of-funds checks, orno responsible gambling interventions—just unchecked exploitation. This isn’t about expecting them to "babysit"“babysitting” me; it’s about holding them accountable for violating Curacao regulationstheir breach of regulatory standards designed to prevent harm.

RegardingYou mentioned staff overlap being speculative, but it’s not speculation. Evidence showsconfirms “Albert” from Duelbits is the same personindividual as “Alexander” onfrom Stake.com—same short dark hair, beard, jawline, and hairline, despite different aliases. The issueThis isn’t just working for multiple casinos—standard industry practice; it’s the lack ofa transparency and different aliases, which raises concerns aboutissue suggesting potential collusion. I’ve never claimed games were rigged—my complaint is about their negligence and deceptive operations. Accountability isn’t shifting blame; it’s demanding they face the consequences of failing their legal obligations.

The refund claim isn’t about shifting blame; it’s about Duelbits’ failure to meet their legal obligations. Curacao court precedent supports refunds for self-excluded players, which they ignored. And to clarify, there’s no accusation of rigged games—the complaint is about their regulatory negligence and deceptive practices.

This isn

Quote from: Trêvoid on April 26, 2025, 03:39:52 PM

Escalate this to Curacao’s licensing authority (info@curacao-egaming.com) with evidence.

Thanks for the advice, Trêvoid. I’ve already submitted a detailed complaint to the Curacao Gaming Control Board (info@curacao-egaming.com), including transaction records, communications with Duelbits, and evidence of staff overlap with Stake.com. I’ll keep everyone updated as this progresses—holding them accountable is the goal, and I’m committed to seeing it through.

Quote from: nutildah on April 28, 2025, 04:12:14 PM

Yet another AI-generated extortion attempt from the king of BJs.

The fact that he put "stolen" in the title lets everyone know you can't take him seriously. Like, the casino reached into his wallet and took his funds, and it wasn't him that willingly gambled away every last cent of it. He didn't even offer any evidence of anything this time. We're just supposed to take his word because, you know, he has such an impeccable reputation.

My favorite part is this:

gamblerhref="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539431.msg65309923#msg65309923">Quote from: kingbj21 on April 24, 2025, 07:35:35 AM

Staff Overlap with Stake.com: My Duelbits VIP host “Albert” turned out to be “Alexander” on Stake.com—same face, different alias. Both platforms deny any link, hinting at a coordinated scam network.

Bro like what? Which dude is supposed to be the same in both pictures? This is bordering on psychosis at this point.

Dismissing this as an “AI-generated extortion attempt” dodges the evidence, nutildah. The title’s bad luck; use of “stolen” isn’t literal—it reflects Duelbits exploiting my vulnerability by neglecting their duty. I’ve provided transaction logs, emails, and screenshots showing $71k in losses with no KYC or responsible gambling measures—hardly “no evidence.” That’s a platform profitingviolation of Curacao standards, not a baseless rant.

To the Community

This isn’t a sob story from exploitationa sore loser—it’s a fight against a licensed casino skirting its responsibilities. Accountability mattersDuelbits failed to enforce safeguards, withheld my betting history, and denied a refund despite Curacao precedent supporting self-excluded players. The evidence is clear: $71,338.44 lost, no intervention, and a VIP host tied to Stake.com. Interestingly, the same person appears in an Amazon product listing—short dark hair, beard, same features—raising more questions about Stake and Duelbits must answer for their actions’ overlap. Are they using fake staff images too?

I’m urging you to boycott Duelbits and Stake.com until they address this. If you support holding them accountable, let’s connect—I’m here to listen and push forward together.

Sincerely,
KingBJ21

Thank you for your perspective, noviesol. I understand your point about personal responsibility in gambling, and I agree that players must be accountable for their decisions. However, licensed casinos like Duelbits have a legal obligation to protect vulnerable players, which they failed to do in my case. Despite clear signs of problem gambling—erratic betting, high deposits, and minimal withdrawals—they ignored their duty to enforce KYC, source-of-funds checks, or responsible gambling interventions. This isn’t about expecting them to "babysit"; it’s about holding them accountable for violating Curacao regulations.

Regarding staff overlap, it’s not speculation. Evidence shows “Albert” from Duelbits is the same person as “Alexander” on Stake.com. The issue isn’t just working for multiple casinos—it’s the lack of transparency and different aliases, which raises concerns about potential collusion.

The refund claim isn’t about shifting blame; it’s about Duelbits’ failure to meet their legal obligations. Curacao court precedent supports refunds for self-excluded players, which they ignored. And to clarify, there’s no accusation of rigged games—the complaint is about their regulatory negligence and deceptive practices.

This isn’t just a gambler’s bad luck; it’s a platform profiting from exploitation. Accountability matters, and Duelbits must answer for their actions.