Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 01/05/2025, 13:24:48 UTC
Quote from: achow101 on April 29, 2025, 05:41:45 PM
Quote from: takuma sato on April 29, 2025, 05:05:31 PM
That should be the point of Bitcoin Core, remain the Core, stick to the basics, and do not add any complexity in the name of innovation.
By that metric, that's what the PR does. It removes more complex code than it adds.

This is a blatant lie, standardness rules aren't that much of a complex code, the code is already there and doesn't require much maintenance. This is typical gaslighting by devs who add endless features that no one uses. The devs write code without users and user feedback for the most part. It's a big academic science project for lot of them in reality.


I don't understand why everyone is flaming us for someone who doesn't frequently contribute to Core opening a PR advocating for a change they'd like to see. Just because there is a PR doesn't mean that it's a good idea or that will be merged.

This is a blatant lie, standardness rules aren't that much of a complex code, the code is already there and doesn't require much maintenance. This is typical gaslighting by devs who add endless features that no one uses. The devs write code without users and user feedback for the most part. It's a big academic science project for lot of them in reality.


"Flaming us"? Mods are out of control, they have literally tagged a lot of the rejection comments with "abuse", "duplicate", "off-topic" tags and now they have locked the PR to only a few devs. Sister, grow a pair of balls and read the room.


Original archived Re: Removing OP_return limits is a huge mistake
Scraped on 01/05/2025, 13:19:34 UTC
Quote from: achow101 on April 29, 2025, 05:41:45 PM
Quote from: takuma sato on April 29, 2025, 05:05:31 PM
That should be the point of Bitcoin Core, remain the Core, stick to the basics, and do not add any complexity in the name of innovation.
By that metric, that's what the PR does. It removes more complex code than it adds.

This is a blatant lie, standardness rules aren't that much of a complex code, the code is already there and doesn't require much maintenance. This is typical gaslighting by devs who add endless features that no one uses. The devs write code without users and user feedback for the most part. It's a big academic science project for lot of them in reality.


I don't understand why everyone is flaming us for someone who doesn't frequently contribute to Core opening a PR advocating for a change they'd like to see. Just because there is a PR doesn't mean that it's a good idea or that will be merged.

"Flaming us"? Mods are out of control, they have literally tagged a lot of the rejection comments with "abuse", "duplicate", "off-topic" tags and now they have locked the PR to only a few devs. Sister, grow a pair of balls and read the room.