Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 01/05/2025, 15:51:34 UTC
Seems that Trump has signed a deal with Ukraine (not Zelensky) to support them, somewhat, in return for mined minerals. Is this accurate and true? If it is, how will that play into a deal Trump might have been considering with Russia... a deal for many times the minerals that Ukraine can offer?
Part of this is false information.
True, Zelensky did not sign the deal. Trump did not sign the deal either. Do you think Trump is not POTUS?
Nah, there is a simple explanation: in diplomacy, most times the deals, negotiations, etc... are signed by what is considered an equivalent level of representation of the US. The lady signing for Ukraine is First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, which is part of Zelenky's government. Equivalent to Bessent in diplomatic terms, who signed for US.
Now, Ukraine did not "give the minerals to the US". The deal does however specifically excludes ANY RUZZIAN participation in the future reconstruction of Ukraine and particularly in their mineral resources. The treaty establishes a very generic framework in which business must be done in favour of both nations.
It is actually quite interesting for Ukraine to have US interests - at least there is some interest from US to keep it independent that way.
If you wish, you can also go to the NASA fire report to confirm hits. Again, all this is useless if you choose not to believe anything that contradicts the brainwashing you went through.
LOL, if anything, all the media brainwashing in the west, including Croatia, was going in other direction:
"shovels"
"dishwasher chips"
"Russia has supplies for 3 days left"
"Russia economy crumbles"
"Ghost of Kyiv"
"cucumber grandma killing drones"
"SU27 downed by shotgun"
"101 wunderwaffe that will win war for Ukraine"
"Putin has ...insert one of 101 illness ha has..."
"Putin will die in...insert number of days..."
Its just that it (obviously) worked on you, and not on me
All of which you have probably read somewhere, but none of which I have given credibility. I know you think all is the same, but if you review my posting you will see no mention of those things - I mean 99%, I have been posting 3 years now.
Original archived Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]
Scraped on 01/05/2025, 15:46:18 UTC
Seems that Trump has signed a deal with Ukraine (not Zelensky) to support them, somewhat, in return for mined minerals. Is this accurate and true? If it is, how will that play into a deal Trump might have been considering with Russia... a deal for many times the minerals that Ukraine can offer?
Part of this is false information.
True, Zelensky did not sign the deal. Trump did not sign the deal either. Do you think Trump is not POTUS?
Nah, there is a simple explanation: in diplomacy, most times the deals, negotiations, etc... are signed by what is considered an equivalent level of representation of the US. The lady signing for Ukraine is First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, which is part of Zelenky's government. Equivalent to Bessent in diplomatic terms, who signed for US.
Now, Ukraine did not "give the minerals to the US". The deal does however specifically excludes ANY RUZZIAN participation in the future reconstruction of Ukraine and particularly in their mineral resources. The treaty establishes a very generic framework in which business must be done in favour of both nations.
It is actually quite interesting for Ukraine to have US interests - at least there is some interest from US to keep it independent that way.