My point is there’s no scam happened. I defined scam as someone committed fraud that cause losses to others. The user only broke the rules of account limit but in terms of work done he did a fair work on his side to get the payment therefore he didn’t scam the project rather just broke some rules.
I consider it as scam if the user in question use AI tool or other dishonest work that is not worth it for a payment. If this user doesn’t caught alt account his work is considered as fine.
yeah, the user ONLY used his alts to join the same campaign that clearly stated in the rules that no alts are allowed, and he ONLY received money he had no right to since he broke the rules. if that's not fraud, i don't know what is.
the amount of fair work or the quality of the posts doesn't fucking matter, all campaigns have some sort of post limit to/that qualify for payment. using an alt to get around those limits to get more money because you are a greedy ass is not okay, so stop trying to justify that it's okay.
and those "some rules" you speak of are basically a written contract between the manager and the campaign participant, you either follow the rules or don't join. it's that simple.
I want to go back to my main battle cry about merit jerker that keeps successfully milking campaign on legal way just because they don’t have evidence of connection aside from blatant merit sharing.
I received butthurt neutral tag for pointing this out but why campaign manager consider merit count that received on topic that is not related on the brand they are promoting. I think post quality on the relevant board is should be the top priority instead of this merit count to deny this merit jerking farming.
this is not the thread to talk about it, so feel free to open your own thread and talk about this there.
let's keep things on topic please.