Quote from: logfiles on Today at 09:22:47 PM

Quote from: Best_Change on March 20, 2025, 03:44:22 PM

We understand that having a website listed in a directory even after ceasing collaboration with them may pose certain risks. This is precisely why we use such text in the snippet, so that search engines explicitly state that we no longer work with them. This page remains accessible so that users can read reviews from others or share their own experiences of working with them.

So Bestchange, since you decided to keep exch old domain on your directory even when it turned out to be a phishing site later stating that you wanted to past reviews to remain accessible to other users even though it was delisted/disabled, why then do you wipe out information by other services?

Should all other scam exchanges be treated the same. At least exch did not scam, but the likes of N exchange are giving users a very bad experience and all you just do is wipe off the information? Please help me understand. Why are you doing this selectively?

1. Yoa Exchanger - Possibly link to n exchange.

It was initially listed on your platform according to archives - (https://web.archive.org/web/20240418124842/https://www.bestchange.com/yoa-exchanger.html)
But as of today, all the information is wiped off your platform - https://www.bestchange.com/yoa-exchanger.html

2. N exchange
Again, initially listed on your platform - (https://web.archive.org/web/20240719034109/https://www.bestchange.ru/nexchange-exchanger.html) and (https://web.archive.org/web/20241212033316/https://www.bestchange.com/nexchange-exchanger.html)

But today, not a single trace - https://www.bestchange.ru/nexchange-exchanger.html and https://www.bestchange.com/nexchange-exchanger.html

I got the impression that Bestchange has changed hands, and that it is now managed by someone who is not particularly concerned about their potential influence on the spread of scams.
They lowered the criteria quite low.