Next scheduled rescrape ... in 6 days
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 05/05/2025, 12:45:45 UTC
Hi guys, honestly I don't even remember since it's a feedback from January
That's one of the reasons why you should add a Reference link to your feedback.Quote
I never give feedback on my own but I follow someone to reinforce
That doesn't sound good. You should at least be able to explain why you left certain feedback (even though you're in no way required to defend yourself).Quote
What do you recommend doing?
If you don't know why you left feedback, it shouldn't be there.As for the negative tag by Vod, it's probably excessive, because it's just your ignorance or misunderstanding of the DT system. If punishment is already necessary in such a case, it would be more appropriate to exclude you from the DT selection.
Agreed. If you want to leave feedback for Trust abuse, it should be neutral. I don't see how this incident makes trading with babo high-risk.You even have to exclude me from the DT
Relax 
The way I read examplens' post, he wrote: "If punishment is already necessary", and I don't think he thinks that's necessary. His argument was against the red tag on your account, not to exlude you.
But in general, a Trust list exclusion is the appropriate action to take when you disagree with the feedback someone left.
May I suggest:
Vod: remove the negative on babo. If you insist on keeping a record on
babo and examplens: get a virtual beer together. Intonation is lost in written text, I see no reason for the two of you to fight over this.
Original archived Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
Scraped on 05/05/2025, 12:40:38 UTC
Hi guys, honestly I don't even remember since it's a feedback from January
That's one of the reasons why you should add a Reference link to your feedback.Quote
I never give feedback on my own but I follow someone to reinforce
That doesn't sound good. You should at least be able to explain why you left certain feedback (even though you're in no way required to defend yourself).Quote
What do you recommend doing?
If you don't know why you left feedback, it shouldn't be there.As for the negative tag by Vod, it's probably excessive, because it's just your ignorance or misunderstanding of the DT system. If punishment is already necessary in such a case, it would be more appropriate to exclude you from the DT selection.
Agreed. If you want to leave feedback for Trust abuse, it should be neutral. I don't see how this incident makes trading with babo high-risk.You even have to exclude me from the DT
Relax The way I read examplens' post, he wrote: "If punishment is already necessary", and I don't think he thinks that's necessary. His argument was against the red tag on your account, not to exlude you.
But in general, a Trust list exclusion is the appropriate action to take when you disagree with the feedback someone left.
May I suggest:
Vod: remove the negative on babo. If you insist on keeping a record on a Trust list for this incident (which I don't think is necessary), make it neutral.
babo and examplens: get a virtual beer together. Intonation is lost in written text, I see no reason for the two of you to fight over this.