Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:33:59 PM

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 11:44:49 AM

Thank you for clarifying the distinction. Here's a concise breakdown of CCECash based on your description:

Non-Custodial/Semi-Custodial Exchange:

Wrong. Fully custodial and centralized instant exchange. If you want, you can add no-account in that explanation.

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 11:44:49 AM

CCECash operates as a platform where users retain control of their assets during transactions (non-custodial), while the exchange may facilitate trades securely without long-term custody of funds.

Are you using AI for your posts or what/who writes these? CCECash and intermediaries have absolute custody and control of the funds. Users have zero control of the funds during the swap process.

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 11:44:49 AM

Decentralization:
CCECash is not fully decentralized.

CCECash, like all instant swap platforms, is completely centralized.

Quote from: Cryptocurrency hipsters on Today at 11:47:08 AM

The point you have been attacking is that the OP said that they are "decentralized and KYC-free". Your judgment is based on subjective judgment only, and there is no objective factual basis at all. You are jumping around here and picking all kinds of faults.

This exchange is centralized and can ask users to undergo KYC if they want to. Read their terms, it's all explained there. It's not based on my judgement. The terms explain how the KYC process works if it comes to that.

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 11:44:49 AM

Before picking all kinds of faults, please come up with real evidence yourself, such as you used this service and found that it was not consistent with their propaganda, so that your statement is more true. Don't attack others based on just a little text information!

My statements are true. I don't need to use the exchange for my statements to be true. I will only use a centralized exchange that I believe I can trust. At this point, CCECash doesn't meet these conditions.

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 11:44:49 AM

If this post is easybit, if they dare to promote their "NO KYC". I will attack them mercilessly like you, because they will conduct KYC verification and have not returned my funds (it has been 7 months). I have all the transaction evidence and screenshots to prove it, instead of attacking here without any basis like you!

If you calmed down and started thinking logically, it would be easier for you to understand what I am talking about. How do you think that easybit took your funds and have been holding them for 7 months? What made that possible? Custody made it possible. When you deposited money into easybit, they gained custody and absolute control of your money. If that wasn't the case, you could have made a transaction any day and moved your coins away from the exchange. But you can't do that, can you? What prevents you from doing it? The answer is again custody. More precisely, the lack of it. You don't hold the keys that would allow you to control your money. easybit does. You are now at their mercy and have to fulfill their requests if you want your money back. Are you starting to understand now?

That's why the custodial vs non-custodial argument is important. You can't claim to be non-custodial if you aren't and expect that people won't correct you. It gives the readers a false sense of security and control.
Any centralized exchange, be it easybit, FixedFloat, Binance, eXch or CCECash, can at any moment freeze your money. Whether or not they will do that is a different question. But they have the means to do it. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be waiting for 7 months for easybit to release your money, would you?

The main reason I argued with you is that you are too pretentious, and you still speak in a pretentious tone until now. Isn't it clear to everyone what you said about "decentralization, NO KYC"? You have to jump out and point it out, treating everyone as idiots, and you are the only smart one?