Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 14/05/2025, 05:31:48 UTC
I knew there were people trying to turn Bitcoin into a general purpose Ethereum-style shitcoin thing for years, but I always assumed cool heads would prevail and common sense would reject those things. Well it turns out this one now is picking some traction. They basically want to allow non-Bitcoin things into Bitcoin. I don't see what the benefits of doing this is. It will just bloat the blockchain. The point of Bitcoin is to move money from A to B, everything else is bloat.
Although you're right that dick pics and fart sounds could make it more expensive to run a full node, I probably will disagree that there's absolutely no benefit if the transactions that you don't like happen in Bitcoin will happen in Bitcoin. Because sometimes when I check the mempool, I see this,
👀
The core benefit is incentives for the miners through fees.
Original archived Re: Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake
Scraped on 07/05/2025, 05:31:53 UTC
I knew there were people trying to turn Bitcoin into a general purpose Ethereum-style shitcoin thing for years, but I always assumed cool heads would prevail and common sense would reject those things. Well it turns out this one now is picking some traction. They basically want to allow non-Bitcoin things into Bitcoin. I don't see what the benefits of doing this is. It will just bloat the blockchain. The point of Bitcoin is to move money from A to B, everything else is bloat.
Although you're right that dick pics and fart sounds could make it more expensive to run a full node, I probably will disagree that there's absolutely no benefit if the transactions that you don't like happen in Bitcoin will happen in Bitcoin. Because sometimes when I check the mempool, I see this,
👀
The core benefit is incentives for the miners through fees.