Quote from: Psychedelic Susa on Today at 08:02:32 PM

Quote from: kTimesG on Today at 12:09:17 PM

Seems like this thread will be full of non-sense and jokes for the next 3+ years, about this and that fantasy.

If you’ve already got a few million in your pocket, it’s better you leave this forum and stop getting in the way of others trying to find different solutions. But if you’re also someone who enjoys solving complex puzzles — then welcome to the club.

I'm not stopping anyone, however people here are hard-wired that some shortcut exists (it doesn't), and a few others endorse that such shortcuts exist (when they don't).

A simple case is the post just above you, which shows that the author has no clue of the difference between a linear complexity and a non-linear complexity algorithm, resulting in a non-sense affirmation (that probabilities change with time). And a few others, that have zero clues on what complexity even means, will most likely believe it. Some words like "mistakenly believed" will be seen as "true" even though it's actually fake information (cataloguing something actually true as false).

Do I need to bring the few cases of the few that lost their houses and lifetime savings chasing this fantasy that they can outsmart mathematics using Python scripts and terabytes of useless data?

No, I don't have 2 mil. $, but even if someone has 100 trillion dollars, this doesn't mean that they can somehow "buy" some magic trick to cheat the mathematics constraints. That stuff can't be bought with any amount of money or research you throw at it. Shit like seeing in the news that "secp256k1 was broken" or "SHA256 is broken" will most likely arrive from some no-name team at some no-name university, not from script kiddies on a anonymous forum.