You're referring to someone who across bitcoins history submitted a couple trivial bug fixes, something well over a thousand people have done.  I wasn't aware of that and I don't think it's either interesting or relevant. Literally anyone in the world can post fixes and a great many have, so what? What you're trying to imply is some kind of conflict of interest among people who decide what changes go into the repository, but it doesn't follow because he isn't one of them.  You've also just completely evaded the point that there doesn't appear to be any reason to think this change is a financial benefit to citrea-- as they already do what they do by bloating the utxo set, which is fine for them but bad for bitcoin.

All it shows, like your invocation Goat above-- a fraudster that put up a bounty to fabricate evidence of unlawful conduct by me after I called him out and before he vanished with people's coins, who didn't even have the integrity to pay out to me when I tried to collect on it-- is that for whatever reason you're just absolutely desperate to smear people.  I'd forgotten about all that, thanks for the reminder of yet another time I helped save people from being defrauded, and yet another time someone criticizing me was ultimately just shown to be a pathetic scammer.
 
Might be time to reconsider some of your life choices, perhaps listen to your wife more.  Who would want to give you an opportunity to you when they see how you act?
 

You're referring to someone who across bitcoins history submitted a couple trivial bug fixes, something well over a thousand people have done.  I wasn't aware of that and I don't think it's either interesting or relevant. Literally anyone in the world can post fixes and a great many have, so what? What you're trying to imply is some kind of conflict of interest among people who decide what changes go into the repository, but it doesn't follow because he isn't one of them.  You've also just completely evaded the point that there doesn't appear to be any reason to think this change is a financial benefit to citrea-- as they already do what they do by bloating the utxo set, which is fine for them but bad for bitcoin.

All it shows, like your invocation Goat above-- a fraudster that put up a bounty to fabricate evidence of unlawful conduct by me after I called him out and before he vanished with people's coins, who didn't even have the integrity to pay out to me when I tried to collect on it-- is that for whatever reason you're just absolutely desperate to smear people.  I'd forgotten about all that, thanks for the reminder of yet another time I helped save people from being defrauded, and yet another time someone criticizing me was ultimately just shown to be a pathetic scammer.
 
Might be time to reconsider some of your life choices, perhaps listen to your wife more.  Who would want to give you an opportunity to you when they see how you act?
 

You're referring to someone who across bitcoins history submitted a couple trivial bug fixes, something well over a thousand people have done.  I wasn't aware of that and I don't think it's either interesting or relevant. Literally anyone in the world can post fixes and a great many have, so what? What you're trying to imply is some kind of conflict of interest among people who decide what changes go into the repository, but it doesn't follow because he isn't one of them.

All it shows, like your invocation Goat above-- a fraudster that put up a bounty to fabricate evidence of unlawful conduct by me after I called him out and before he vanished with people's coins, who didn't even have the integrity to pay out to me when I tried to collect on it-- is that for whatever reason you're just absolutely desperate to smear people.  I'd forgotten about all that, thanks for the reminder of yet another time I helped save people from being defrauded, and yet another time someone criticizing me was ultimately just shown to be a pathetic scammer.
 
Might be time to reconsider some of your life choices, perhaps listen to your wife more.  Who would want to give you an opportunity to you when they see how you act?